Wednesday, August 22, 2012
Thanks to the efforts of Ukrainian volunteer you can enjoy over 86000
artworks of more than 350 artists on your Apple device. Browse most
viewed artworks and paintings by artists or simply search for your
favorite artwork to enjoy it.
The app is currently available on iTunes as a
free application for iPhone, iPod touch and iPad.
Get inspired with art in your pocket!
Friday, June 1, 2012
Hercules Seghers, Baroque, Dutch
Jusepe de Ribera, Baroque, Spanish
Pietro da Cortona, Baroque, Italian
Jan Siberechts, Baroque, Flelmish
Adriaen van de Velde, Baroque, Dutch
Antoine Pesne, Rococo, French
Allan Ramsay, Rococo, Scottish
Fyodor Rokotov, Rococo, Russian
William Shayer, Romanticism, British
Cornelis Springer, Romanticism, Dutch
William Holman Hunt, Romanticism, Symbolism, British
Philip Wilson Steer, Impressionism, British
Mario Sironi, Futurism, Metaphysical art, Italian
David Salle, Neo-Expressionism, American
Stay with us!
Friday, April 6, 2012
In February we started accepting donations from our users. It wasn’t much, but still we are very thankful for your help (A. R. Wallace, Kristina Marie Brendel, joeyv7), it means a lot! We’d also like to tell you (and all our future potential donors) how we’ve spent your money.
WikiPaintings hosting is based on dedicated server running on windows server and hosts project and Amazon Web Services, which uses
- S3 to host backup files
- CDN for static files to improve site loading speed
|january 2012||$ 198,70|
|february 2012||$ 198,70|
|march 2012||$ 198,70|
|total for 3 month||$ 596,10|
|january 2012||$ 43,77|
|february 2012||$ 55,06|
|march 2012||$ 84,10|
|total for 3 month||$ 182,93|
|total hosting expenses for 3 month||$ 779.03|
WikiPaintings technical support and development includes work of web developers and html coder. In 2012 Q1 we added following features:
- Editing functionality improvements
- Preparations to migrate data to Microsoft Azure data storage.
|hours||price per hour||total|
|total for 3 month||32||$ 12,00||$ 384,00|
Total expenses for 2012 Q1: $1163,03
Our project is non-commercial. Since we don’t have any kind of advertising, our only source of income is donations from our users.
|A. R. Wallace||Feb 3||$ 30,00|
|Kristina Marie Brendel||Mar 4||$ 100,00|
|joeyv7||Mar 12||$ 15,00|
|total income for 3 month||$140,65|
The difference between our costs and incomes was paid from personal funds of the initiative group.
We would like to thank again to our donors. As you can see from this report, 100% of your donations directly funded project costs. Just as importantly, your aid demonstrated solidarity with our goal to make art open and accessible!
We would also ask all our users (who have such possibility) to donate small sum to this project. Without public support, further development of WikiPaintings.org would be impossible.
Unfortunately, our country (Ukraine) doesn’t support such popular payment gateways as Paypal, Amazon, and Google Checkout; that’s why we have to use IPay.ua payment gateway. We beg your pardon for this inconvenience.
We have a lot of ideas how to improve our site; shortly we’ll publish our “Roadmap” which includes all productive ideas of our users. With your little help, we can make Wikipaintings so much better!
Thursday, March 29, 2012
We had a very interesting e-mail from one of our users. We've decided to post it here together with our reply, and ask you to join the discussion. Perhaps together we'll find optimal way of further development of WikiPaintings.
Art is great and beautiful, but also complex, confusing and frustrating. Using the same historicist approach that dictates a certain path of art movements through time is allowing for the continued misinformation of the general public, and insuring that poor art historians and critics remain in positions of power (and so the art market prevails over art itself). An encyclopedia of painting is possible, but grouping these artists across time under art "movements" is ignoring their own, individual, nuanced trajectories full of unexpected twists and turns. Please do not disseminate concepts that are still in discussion. The idea of art movements as a linear history of art itself is already questioned and discredited by most serious scholars. Please do not force artists and their works into neat little boxes. Categorize only what is objective and certain: dates, names, techniques. But please, please do not force a conceptual framework onto art! Please don't help maintain misconceptions about art! Please don't objectify art - it is much much more. This is a great project, but it is already headed in a labeling rather than informing and enlightening direction. Please. Help art break free from the confines of imposed categories!
Thank you very much for your passionate remark! It’s a real pleasure that someone obviously well-informed and so in love with art still finds our project great, despite of the fundamental disagreement with its structure.
We truly do understand your point of view. Indeed, when applied to such a different (in historical perspective and conceptual value) items as art of 15 and 20 century, notions like art movement and genre are somewhat confusing, because they have slightly (and sometimes crucially) different meaning in those contexts.
However, do you really think it’s possible, or productive, to talk about art history without these notions? Can you study art avoiding terms like Renaissance,
Let’s not go to extremes, because both of them are absurd. Putting art into “neat little boxes” of styles, and claiming that Monet’s Impressionism is literally the same as Levitan’s Impressionism is just as stupid as avoiding all style classification at all, and stating that those two artists have nothing in common and differs one from another as much, as Rembrandt differs from Malevich.
There are plenty of amazing sites, dedicated to individual artists, which provide well-structured analytical scope of their “nuanced trajectories full of unexpected twists and turns”. There are also quite a lot of extensive web recourses which do not apply any classification to art. We offer something in between. You can browse some artist’s woks chronologically and analyse evolution (or degradation :) of his unique style, but you can also compare stylistically related paintings of different artists and draw your own conclusions.
We don’t see how it’s possible to provide basic knowledge without “labels”. Would you use them as information or disinformation depends solely on your intellectual potential.
We just provide you with tools. Use them creatively!
Tuesday, March 20, 2012
Estamos contentos de informarle de que la versión en español de Enciclopedia de pintura wikipaintings.org ya está disponible! Agradecemos sus comentarios y correcciones de posibles errores, porque el lenguaje español n es nuestro idioma nativo.
Para contactarnos por favor escriba a firstname.lastname@example.org
Friday, March 2, 2012
It is fascinating to see how you say about wikipaintings.org on twitter:
Wow why have I never discovered wikipaintings before this is a God send - @Olivia_Trinder
http://www.wikipaintings.org/ is literally a dream come true. - @NicholasBoyd
This is my new favorite website - @bobdobolina
Thank god for wikipaintings #lifesaver - @NicoleScott_
If you go to http://www.wikipaintings.org you will never be dissapointed, especially on an HD monitor. You'll probably cry tears of joy. Unreal! - @mattewestvanic
We added donations so you can help to develop new features faster and cover hosting expenses.
We do have a lot of new ideas. Our nearest plans are focused on improvements of editorial functionality, couple of gallery features and Spanish version of our encyclopedia.